Grater Ease

Grater Ease

Grater Ease

Enhancing the research process and checkout experience to increase conversion rates.

Background

Grater Ease is an e-commerce company selling countertop kitchen appliances, cookware, gadgets, and more. I worked to increase conversions and decrease drop rates by adding a guest checkout option and comparison feature.

Problem

  • High levels of cart abandonment prior to checkout

  • High levels of site abandonment after opening multiple tabs

Solution

  • Add a guest checkout option to the registration page

  • Create a product comparison feature to help users research their options without leaving the site

Role

UX Researcher

UX Designer

UI Designer

Tools

Paper and Pencil

Dovetail

Figma/Figjam

Timeline

4 Weeks

Process

Discover

Ideate

Design

Validate

Discover

Generative Research

To get started, I talked with five home cooks. Before I could determine the most important areas for improvement to address the company's usability issues, I needed to understand their…

  • Shopping behaviors (general and specific to countertop kitchenware)

  • Goals

  • Pain points

Affinity Mapping

I synthesized the research data using an affinity map, so I could find the larger themes of what participants had shared.

Biggest Takeaways

  • Research! Users are comparing multiple items and looking for the lowest prices before buying

  • Users want to buy from brands they trust and will spend more for good quality products

  • A quick checkout process is key and users want full price transparency (e.g. taxes and shipping)

  • Users don't want to be forced to make an account before checking out, but they don't mind providing their email or saving their information

  • Users like seeing company recommendations on a site

Persona

Using the synthesized data, I created the persona Julia, to better understand the main Grater Ease users. This…

  • Helped me empathize with users

  • Led me to make user-centered decisions by considering how each choice would affect Julia’s goals and frustrations

Ideate

HMW

Enhance the checkout experience?

Idea Chosen

Guest checkout option

Reasoning

The original site required users to create an account before purchasing. Research participants overwhelmingly expressed they did not want to have to create an account on a site as a new user, but I didn’t want to remove the option completely because it was important to the company to encourage users to create an account.

Intended Outcome

See a decrease in site abandonment in the checkout flow.

HMW

Help users decide which product is right for them?

Idea Chosen

Compare feature

Reasoning

Julia would research and compare multiple items regardless of what a quiz determined to be the best option for her,

Intended Outcome

Provide users with the ability to compare products in one place without leaving the site to increase conversion rates.

User Flows

I created user flows to show how users would navigate the site and interact with the comparison and guest checkout features. This helped me get deeper into the user’s mind, by considering all the different routes the main user type (like Julia) might take to conversion. It also gave me a chance to consider edge-case users. This helped me ensure the flows would work for all users, especially those landing on a page within the flow, instead of the homepage. 

The user flows gave me a clear idea of each necessary screen and how they would all fit together in the design to create intuitive processes. 

User Flow Key

Product Comparison Flow

Guest Checkout Flow

To reduce the necessary clicks needed in the guest checkout flow, I put the shipping, delivery, and payment all on one screen.

  • It decreased the number of pages to navigate pre-conversion

  • Made it easier to edit orders since all the information would be on one page

  • Fewer clicks = less time checking out = quicker conversions

Design

Sketches

At this point in the project, I became focused on how to present information all at once in a clear and scannable way to aid users in their research process.

Product List Page

Product Page

Comparison Page

Upon reflection of my sketches:

  • I focused too much on a single aspect of the user experience and did not take a wholistic view.

  • I could have improved my design and saved time later by:

    • Increasing the visual hierarchy

    • Seeking feedback and collaboration from another designer

Wireframes

I was hoping users would find the presentation of information clear and easy to use for research.

Homepage

Product List Page

Product Page

Comparison Page

Registration (Guest Checkout)

Validate

Usability Tests Round 1

During user testing, I quickly realized how overwhelming the design was for users, especially on the product and comparison pages.

Gaining direct user feedback reminded me I needed to keep the whole user in mind as I made decisions.

Moving forward, I took information from my persona, Julia, and the data from generative research and user testing to make more informed decisions.

Problem

Solution

Lead to 100% success rate

Problem

Solution

The bolding and line removal helped users during the second round of testing, but starting with fewer specs visible didn’t solve the problem.  The underlying issue of there being too much information still remained.

UI Design

  • I used bright colors and images for user enjoyment

  • Red was used to give the buttons prominence

  • The icons and buttons are slightly rounded to convey friendliness

  • I used two text styles and various sizes to increase hierarchy

  • I kept color to a minimum to allow users to focus on the product images, but still used it to highlight important information

High-Fidelity Screens

My main focus while creating these screens:

  • Empathize with my users to decrease the information overload experienced during the first round of user testing

Homepage

Product List Page

Product Page

Comparison Page

Registration (Guest Checkout)

Usability Tests Round 2

After redesigning elements based on user testing feedback and the overall user experience, I conducted 5 more usability tests using the high-fidelity screens.

I needed to ensure users could find information easily throughout the site without feeling overwhelmed.

Problem: The comparison page

Solution: A complete redesign

Throughout the usability tests, there were no usability issues with the guest checkout flow solution. However, a different issue emerged.

Problem

Solution

Based on unofficial user feedback, these changes had a huge impact on user enjoyment of the site. 

Final Screens

After the second round of user testing, it was clear I needed to polish the overall look and feel of the site to make it more inviting and enjoyable for users.

Homepage

Product List Page

Product Page

Cart

Checkout

Order Completed

Next Steps

  • Test again

    • Has the cognitive load been reduced for users and were the correct specs kept on the comparison overlay? 

    • Does the brand's personality and attributes carry through from landing to checkout? 

  • Once implemented, validate the designs by measuring the success metric of reduced customer site and cart abandonment.

Learnings

  • Simple, simple, simple! Good design is simple and intuitive. If I have to add something extra to try and help users (*cough* the your specs section *cough cough*), the design probably isn’t working and needs to be iterated on or redesigned. 

  • Don’t reinvent the wheel, but don’t follow others blindly. Sometimes what you see others doing isn’t always best for your users. It’s important to base design decisions on your specific users and always remember to ask what purpose each element serves to the user experience.

Let's connect

Reach out with opportunities or just to say hi!

Copyright © 2024 Claire Goldgeier. All Rights Reserved.

Let's connect

Reach out with opportunities or just to say hi!

Copyright © 2024 Claire Goldgeier. All Rights Reserved.

Let's connect

Reach out with opportunities or just to say hi!

Copyright © 2024 Claire Goldgeier. All Rights Reserved.